Gray vs OpenCode: which open-source agent should you use?
Last updated
Short answer
Choose OpenCode if you want a polished, dedicated terminal coding UI that speaks to 75+ providers. Choose Gray if you want an even smaller MIT harness — one static binary, bash as the only default tool — that is a general always-on agent rather than a dedicated coding interface.
| Gray | OpenCode | |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Minimal, always-on AI harness: one Rust binary, open source (MIT) | Open-source (MIT) terminal coding agent with a full TUI |
| Interface | Terminal REPL and headless print mode; Discord and other apps through plugins | Rich terminal UI with sessions, diffs and built-in LSP |
| Providers | Any OpenAI-compatible provider with your own API key; local models through Ollama; Claude Pro/Max and ChatGPT plans through official plugins | 75+ providers through Models.dev, including Claude Pro/Max and ChatGPT sign-in, plus its own Zen service |
| Data | Conversations, sessions and credentials stay on your machine under ~/.gray | Its documentation states OpenCode stores none of your code or context data |
| Extends with | Plugins and skills; MCP servers through the official plugin | Custom agents, commands, plugins and MCP servers |
| Security model | Runs the model's shell commands with your user's privileges; no sandbox or approval prompt by default. The official permissions plugin adds approvals | Its plan agent is read-only by default and asks before running bash commands |
| Runs 24/7 | Yes — the gateway runs Gray as a user service, with cron and app connections | Interactive sessions plus a serve/run mode for scripts |
| Price | Free (MIT); you pay your model provider. Hosted Voyager plan $77/month, not yet open | Free (MIT); optional paid services, or pay your provider |
Is Gray more minimal than OpenCode?
Yes. OpenCode ships a full terminal UI with LSP, sessions and diff views; Gray is deliberately smaller — one static binary, a REPL and headless mode, with everything else added as a plugin or skill.
Aider vs OpenCode vs Gray — which should I pick?
Pick Aider for Git-first pair programming, OpenCode for a polished terminal coding UI, and Gray for a minimal always-on harness that isn't limited to coding tasks. All three are open source and work with your own provider keys.
Which is better for privacy, Gray or OpenCode?
Both keep your code off vendor servers: OpenCode's docs state it stores none of your code or context data, and Gray keeps conversations and credentials on your machine under ~/.gray. With a cloud model, your code still goes to whichever provider you configure — pair either with Ollama for fully local runs; see Privacy.
When should you choose OpenCode instead?
Choose OpenCode if a rich coding TUI is the point — visual diffs, LSP-aware edits and session management — or you want its 75+ provider catalog and Zen service out of the box.
Sources
- OpenCode: official site
- OpenCode on GitHub (MIT)
- Open Source Alternatives: open-source coding agents compared
- Gray docs: Safety
- Gray docs: Providers & models
- Gray docs: Gateway & apps
Competitor details are taken from the sources above as of the date at the top of this page. Products change quickly — if something here is out of date, open an issue on GitHub.
More comparisons
- Gray vs OpenClaw
- Gray vs Hermes Agent
- Gray vs Grok Bot
- Gray vs OpenAI Dots
- Gray vs Claude Code
- Gray vs Aider
- Gray vs Codex CLI
- Gray vs Gemini CLI
- Gray vs Cursor
- Gray vs Cline
- Gray vs OpenHands
- Gray vs Goose
- Gray vs Continue
- Gray vs Kilo Code
- Gray vs Devin
- OpenClaw alternatives
- Claude Code alternatives
- Best open-source AI coding agents
- Best lightweight AI agent harnesses
- FAQ